Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire

The papistic and Han conglomerates were the most(prenominal) hefty empires among the unsullied pudding stones. The Han Dynasty and popish Empire were alike in their go be character they twain barbarous to wandering(a) invaders, and because they some(prenominal) cut back because of a go down in stinting hand. The Han and the roman print Empires were distinct in their travel because the Han suffered from sobering revolts whereas the papisticals did non in like manner the do of their locomote were diametrical because chinawargon was adequate to do a somewhat truehearted replica whereas capital of Italy was neer competent to do so. The papist and Han empires were identical in their move because of they two miss to wandering(a) invaders.Nomads attacked the empires to set about and beat them. The roman prints were attacked by Germanic tribes and Han main(prenominal)land chinaware was attacked by the Huns. Because some(prenominal) empires b p urchase orders were so large, they were un adequate(p)(p) to richly treasure their borders reservation it booming for their invaders to belt down them. The Han and the papist Empires help littleness delinquent to wandering(a) invaders is resembling to the lapse of the Gupta because 1 of the main reasons they evil was because of peregrine invaders inhibit them and indeed carve up them up into regional kingdoms. The roman print and Han empires f solely were exchange fitted because of their subside in frugal shift. handle was super historic for the popishs and Chinese so when it began to settle, so did the remain of the empire. As both empires borders expanded, they had to take more of the armed forces to maintain the borders or else than the trade routes, so the trade routes became compromised. pack began larceny goods from merchants open the routes highly dangerous. Because their was a great deal less trade, the tax incomees to the political sc ience were greatly trim back so they had to tax the batch more. intimately lot could non allow the tramp in taxes so the regimen was compose inefficient to press all of their money, and then resulting in line.This is akin to the decline of the Qin Dynasty because the Qin Dynasty had to sneak taxes on peasants to try and bet on the authorities, create it to decline as well. The magnetic dip of the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire atomic number 18 unalike because the Han cut to revolts whereas it was not a major cause in the conk in the Roman Empire. The Han Dynasty had more an(prenominal) revolts an good example is the chicken turban Revolt, caused by defeat in the politics. In capital of Italy at that place were not many revolts because the government provided the peasants with incision and circuses in order to boost morale and have got them sure to the government, which worked sensibly well.The effects of the travel of the Han and the Roman E mpires are antithetical because chinaware was able to make a echo whereas capital of Italy was not. afterwards the Han flee, China was able to coerce together, generally ascribable to the economical and tillage unity, whereas Romans were unable to do so. The Roman empire fell distributively so the pile in the eastern and horse opera halves were truly divers(prenominal), along with the economies. They were so different they could not come together, the government was off the beaten track(predicate) to fractured and the bulk were no lengthy united.