Confidence Interval and Reflective Writing Tips

Reflective authorship Tips Reflective writing is where you revisit consumes and save d testify your thoughts near them, asking questions much(prenominal) as What did I notice? wherefore did it happen this way? How was I changed by this? What qualification I make water do differently? How could I take over handled the berth differently in hindsight? What develop I learnt virtu on the wholey myself? How do I move in a team? How did I feel? Why did I fight back the way I did? How drop I improve for next magazine? You volition need to do a grant of research, There is a reading hark provided as a starting point. Do you follow any of the theories? Have you got experiences right away that show the theories are true? You do not need to be analyzing opposite team members actions. This is not a assembly to blame everyone else You should be looking inward at yourself for answers and looking at your attract reactions to the situations and how you could impr ove and grow. This is not a piece of music so you dont need to follow overlay format. You can lay it come to the fore moreover you want to.It should mainly be about what you have learnt in PASBD plainly you could loan in some personal experience if you wish. You will need proper SHU Harvard referencing and a bibliography. Leaf allow attached. Dont be too descriptive about the detail of what happened, it is more about your analysis of why the social functions happened that did. Finally I have devil examples from people who have done this assignment previously, one mentally ill and one very exhaustively. Bad pattern approx 40% As a last-place year student, the reflection on team building or team works is fork uping when you dont whap the people you are working with.The world-class test is to promulgate in various forms of communications which are needed to tog times to support and possibly exchange contact detail at this stage so you know who, where and what a per son looks resembling when its time to meet. Personally when the first group was formed, the initial test was to email group members to arrange possible times to meet, however I was lucky enough to have two members within my group to which I have worked with before throughout my course, in that locationfore there was a built relationship already which made work carried out easier.This meant I know the capability, thrive and enthusiasm of those individuals to backpack out given task, although one of them can be a bit bossy, on the opposite hand it was more difficult to predict what the other members would be like, as for not knowing who they are and what tolerant of a person they are this bought my self-confidence levels down. When faced with a situation such as meeting people for the first time, it is always good to start polish off on the right foot. In my own personal experience the best thing to do was to meet the group and have to know the members and see what they are l ike.In terms of confidence, it was certain that they all had uniform thoughts going through their minds to what an individual like myself or others would bring to the team. When we started the first shell which was Atkinsons the two stronger members led the way and the consist of us were quite laughing(prenominal) to let them take control. We decided that we shouldnt move to Meadowhall which dark out to be the right choice. The privileged trust exercise didnt turn out as well as we didnt think about who we were presenting to. I wasnt happy about the mark for this. Good causa approx 90% When considering what part I might play, I considered what team role I would suit from Belbins (1981) psychological profiles of how people behave, gift and interrelate with others. Due to my confident and potent personality my perception would have before been that of the alpha female. To initiate thoughts, make executive director decisions and organise the group towards the end goal. looking for at the team roles outlined, I would have classed myself as a co-ordinator Mature, confident, a good chairperson clarifies goals, promotes decision-making, delegates well. This summary reflects how I would try to control the group work to what I want to hit. Being a of course confident person I matte that I would be able to asseverate influence on people to achieve what I wanted by allowing my sort to be controlled by my internal personality (Bateman and Crate, 1993). As tasks began, I found it difficult to let go when tasks were divided and I seek to micro-manage. This lack of trust in other peoples work meant that I put extra pressure and workload on myself.In order to improve my actions (and stress levels) I have to better understand my locus of control (Rotter 1966) whether the event is within(internal) or beyond(external) my personal control. I have come to learn that fetching is not everything and too great a focus on it can frustrate learning. Problems came to head when my considered personal strength was manifold with another strong character, I mat like I had to fight to get my point across. I felt crush by constant, critical comment as she would often counteract my ideas or oust them.However, we found that our debates achieved an effective balance and we produced a high quality presentation by using constructive criticism. I form now that she was not aiming to target or discredit my ideas or work but she was just trying to achieve a better result by challenge my suggestions. I have learnt that in early I should value all criticisms as they can enhance my performance. Finally Its all about the journey and not the destination. nidus on the process and learning with an internal emphasis. Its not about whether you got the tasks right or wrong but about what you erudite about yourself and life whilst doing them.